Avoiding
Smart Meter’s in Victoria
(A
Manual of facts to help you)
The
aim of this web page is to provide you with some little known facts
to assist you in your fight to protect your health, privacy and
democratic right to say ‘NO’. It has been compiled from personal
experience and many hours of research.
If
you complain that your smart meter radiation is making you sick and
you get the answer that “everything is within ASPANSA limits".
Technically, this answer is correct. It is not the job of
distributors to check out faults in standards. ARPANSA RPS3 (the
standards) have some issues, I spoke about it in another post.
But the distributors do have other obligations. For example they have to obey Equal Opportunity Act.
But the distributors do have other obligations. For example they have to obey Equal Opportunity Act.
Sections
44 and 45:
«Discrimination in the provision of goods and services»,
(b) in the terms on which goods or services are provided to the other person
It sounds as though distributor must supply you with electricity regardless of what kind of electrical meter you have.
«Discrimination in the provision of goods and services»,
(b) in the terms on which goods or services are provided to the other person
It sounds as though distributor must supply you with electricity regardless of what kind of electrical meter you have.
Section 15: Duty to
eliminate discrimination...
(1) This section applies to a person who has a duty under Part 4, 6 or 7 not to engage in discrimination...
(2) A person must take reasonable and proportionate measures to eliminate that discrimination... as far as possible.
(1) This section applies to a person who has a duty under Part 4, 6 or 7 not to engage in discrimination...
(2) A person must take reasonable and proportionate measures to eliminate that discrimination... as far as possible.
So if you have medical condition (EHS) your distributor must make some adjustments. For example remove Smart meter from your house.
And also distributors in Victoria should have policies and procedures how to deal with people who suffer from EHS. But I never heard about miracle like this.
As far as I concern mostly they just bully people into moving interstate.
And there is section 45:
Service provider must make reasonable adjustments for person with
a disability
According
to this, a Distributor should use another meter, which does not emit
radiation. It is NOT your problem which meter they will use and what
written about it in THEIR rules. You have rights! If they do not want
to know about your rights because they too much concern about their
profits - bring them to court!
Human
rights division of VCAT is FREE for Applicant. How much money will be
spent by distributor - it is THEIR problem. Applicant is not responsible for expenses of Defendant.
You just want to keep your
Manually Read Meter, which was used (and still is) around the world
for a century. No way it can be treated as "un-reasonable"
adjustment.
The distributors try to
cover-up their bulling tactics by this:
PART
5—GENERAL EXCEPTIONS TO AND EXEMPTIONS FROM THE PROHIBITION OF
DISCRIMINATION
Section 75 Things done with statutory authority
(1) A person may discriminate if the discrimination is necessary to comply with, or is authorised by, a provision of—
(a) an Act, other than this Act; or
(b) an enactment, other than an enactment under this Act.
Yes, they have orders to install Smart meters. But "the best endeavours" never made them compulsory. And "the best endeavours" do not allow them to make people suffer from EHS.
Section 75 Things done with statutory authority
(1) A person may discriminate if the discrimination is necessary to comply with, or is authorised by, a provision of—
(a) an Act, other than this Act; or
(b) an enactment, other than an enactment under this Act.
Yes, they have orders to install Smart meters. But "the best endeavours" never made them compulsory. And "the best endeavours" do not allow them to make people suffer from EHS.
So usage section 75 as a defence is very questionable in this case.
More, there was "Waters v Public Transport Corporation" case which may be a good precedent in case of class action.
More, there was "Waters v Public Transport Corporation" case which may be a good precedent in case of class action.
And there is a Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006
1
Purpose and citation
(c) imposing an obligation
on all public authorities to act in a way that is compatible with
human rights;
So there is a fare chance
VCAT will interpret section 75 in your favour.
(d) requiring statements
of compatibility with human rights to be prepared in respect of all
Bills introduced into Parliament and enabling the Scrutiny of Acts
and Regulations Committee to report on such compatibility
And it NEVER happened with
any document related to Smart meter rollout!
But
unless you go to court you will not know for sure. You may suffer for
rest of your life from radiation or get rid of Smart meter if you
take action.
The
choice is your.
Write me if you have any
questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment